<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You are a fool if you buy&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thickenmywallet.com/blog/wp/2008/03/07/you-are-a-fool-if-you-buy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thickenmywallet.com/blog/wp/2008/03/07/you-are-a-fool-if-you-buy/</link>
	<description>Everything to do with thickening your wallet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thicken My Wallet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The case against dual class shares (again)</title>
		<link>http://www.thickenmywallet.com/blog/wp/2008/03/07/you-are-a-fool-if-you-buy/comment-page-1/#comment-21629</link>
		<dc:creator>Thicken My Wallet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The case against dual class shares (again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thickenmywallet.com/blog/wp/2008/03/07/you-are-a-fool-if-you-buy/#comment-21629</guid>
		<description>[...] generally panned by the blogsphere since dual class shares tend to perform worse than their peers, controlling shareholders tend to run roughshod over the minority shareholders and, as we are seeing, the unwinding of dual class share structures can be a very painful and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] generally panned by the blogsphere since dual class shares tend to perform worse than their peers, controlling shareholders tend to run roughshod over the minority shareholders and, as we are seeing, the unwinding of dual class share structures can be a very painful and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Jungle - &#187; Dual-Class Shares Unloved But Don&#8217;t Write Them Off Too Quickly</title>
		<link>http://www.thickenmywallet.com/blog/wp/2008/03/07/you-are-a-fool-if-you-buy/comment-page-1/#comment-8598</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Jungle - &#187; Dual-Class Shares Unloved But Don&#8217;t Write Them Off Too Quickly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thickenmywallet.com/blog/wp/2008/03/07/you-are-a-fool-if-you-buy/#comment-8598</guid>
		<description>[...] voting power over another. ThickenMyWallet recently wrote a post on dual-class shares titled &#8220;You&#8217;re a fool if you buy&#8230;&#8220;:  The primary disadvantage of a company with a dual-class share structure is there are no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] voting power over another. ThickenMyWallet recently wrote a post on dual-class shares titled &#8220;You&#8217;re a fool if you buy&#8230;&#8220;:  The primary disadvantage of a company with a dual-class share structure is there are no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.thickenmywallet.com/blog/wp/2008/03/07/you-are-a-fool-if-you-buy/comment-page-1/#comment-7850</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thickenmywallet.com/blog/wp/2008/03/07/you-are-a-fool-if-you-buy/#comment-7850</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link!  Very informative post!  Years ago I knew a guy who ran a hobby shop, and he&#039;d bring in new partners whenever he ran low on cash.  He&#039;d insist that he always retain 51% of the company (and would dilute earlier partners&#039; equity to bring in the new person).  You&#039;re totally right that this puts too much power into one party&#039;s hands (and does not a good partnership make).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!  Very informative post!  Years ago I knew a guy who ran a hobby shop, and he&#8217;d bring in new partners whenever he ran low on cash.  He&#8217;d insist that he always retain 51% of the company (and would dilute earlier partners&#8217; equity to bring in the new person).  You&#8217;re totally right that this puts too much power into one party&#8217;s hands (and does not a good partnership make).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

