Aug 26

Effective Negotiation Tactics: Staying away from the absolutes

I have created a new category called “negotiations” and added all my previous posts on negotiations into them. I hope you enjoy this once in a while series. Today’s negotiation tip comes courtesy of our friends at Last Minute Training who suggested that one of the cardinal sins of negotiating is to take absolute positions or make definitive pronouncements.

When I was a junior lawyer, I was taught many things about communicating by some great mentors. One of the key fundamentals I was taught was that any statement made or written should not be definitive unless it is an undisputed fact by the other side. Try to put escape routes in your communications and generally make things as broad as possible (the other side’s mission is to make you as “narrow” as possible in your position; hence  trial lawyers are taught to phrase questions that only have yes or no answers). For example, if you read this blog frequently, you will notice I like writing using the words “generally” or “i understand” or “subject to” or “assuming…” Generalities have exceptions. Understandings can change. Subject to means a set of conditions must apply before a statement is true. Assumptions shift.

All of these phrases couch a particular statement to some exception (fundamentally, legal drafting is based on a rule, an exception to the rule and an exception to the exception). Non-lawyers call them “weasel words” for a reason. They allow you to get out of positions since the position itself has a built in escape hatches. It is probably 1 of 9,862 things that drive people crazy about lawyers (and why lawyers marry other lawyers- its fun to win arguments but not so good for personal relationships).

The opposite are the absolute statements: “Daddy is always right,” “This is the best used car ever,” “you can get great returns with no risk,” “this is the cheapest Blue-Ray machine in the city.” They paint you into a corner and if that absolute is proven to be wrong, several things can happen:

  1. You look like a fool and your creditability just went down several notches;
  2. You immediately become on the defensive about your absolute statement (“…did I say no risk? Well, there’s risk in every investment isn’t there…”) which means you are not negotiating from a position of strength; or
  3. You spend an inordinate amount of time trying to prove your absolute statement was right instead of negotiating the real point.

I was once told that there are three absolutes in life: taxes, death and change. Everything else is a varying shade of gray so why be absolute when so little in life is not?

7 Responses to “Effective Negotiation Tactics: Staying away from the absolutes”

  1. WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com Says:

    Everyone knows only a Sith deals in absolutes!

    Wow I’m a geek.

  2. admin Says:

    You’re killing me! Hmmm… maybe a Star Wars inspired post is in the works?!?

  3. Colby Says:

    This reminds me of myself – I almost always use ‘as I understand/as far as I know’ or some kind of non-absolute form when I give advice or information, as long as I’m not 110% sure that the answer/advice I’m giving is correct.

    Maybe I should’ve been a lawyer instead of an engineer, LOL

  4. moneygardener Says:

    People today are too afraid to be wrong.

  5. MoneyGrubbingLawyer Says:

    I was taught the exact same approach- always give yourself an exit.

    However, one partner was adamant that any advice that I give to him or to a client be in absolute terms- his rationale was that no client would pay $300 an hour for what amounts to a “maybe”. Give a yes or a no, stick to it and find a way to justify it. Always seemed to me to be a dangerous way to practice…

  6. Nancy (aka money coach) Says:

    On the other hand, I think we need to know what our true bottom lines are. I’ve found myself too often ending up somewhere I didn’t like (be it professionally or in a relationship) because I didn’t draw the line in the sand soon enough.

  7. Stephen Frenkel Says:

    One way to counter the negative impact of painting yourself into a corner, while giving yourself an out at the same time would be to say something like “Unless there’s another way to look at this…,” “Unless I’m missing something…,” or even “With the information I’ve been given…”

    This allows you to be firm, but also acknowledge that you might not have all the information. That way, you can provide a strong opinion (based on your expertise), but maintain the fact that you don’t know everything (no one does) and that you can always change your mind, should pursuasive arguments or new relevant information come to light.

Leave a Reply