What the proposed new credit card rules mean to you
Posted by admin on May 25, 2009 in Credit Score, Investment Information
Canada’s Department of Finance issued proposed new regulations on credit card rules which are aimed towards: (i) targeting certain abuses of the credit card industry; and (ii) providing better transparency for all credit card users. Since the regulations are subject to consultation, they are not final but here are a few proposed changes to be aware of:
- There must be a 21 day grace period on new credit purchases. Currently, some credit card issuers accrue interest on new purchases if the customer has an outstanding balance carried forward in the previous statement. In other words, interest is charged on both the outstanding balance and the new purchase. The new regulations require credit card issuers not to charge interest for 21 days on the new purchase.
- Allocation of payment will be beneficial to the customer. Some credit card charge different interest rates for purchases, balance transfer credit cards and cash advances with the credit card company being allowed to apply payments to the balance with the lowest interest rate. The new regulations would require credit card companies to allocate payment to the balance charging the highest interest rate or proportionally to different balances, with both methods resulting in lower interest being paid by the customer.
- No credit limit increases without consent.
- No penalties if credit limit is exceeded due to merchant holds. Some merchants place holds on credit cards until the transaction is completed (for example, if you book a hotel room, the hotel will hold place a hold on your credit card to ensure they are paid). If a customer’s credit limit is exceeded due solely to a merchant hold, the new regulations prohibit the credit card companies from penalizing the customer for exceeding its credit limit.
For most card card holders who do not use most of the credit provided or pay their balance in full every month, these proposed measures will have little to no impact on their everyday lives.
However, as part of a separate set of regulations, new disclosure rules are also coming into force:
- Key information must now be in a summary box. The current regulations do not require interest rate information, grace period terms and other fees to be consolidated in one place. The proposed regulation requires all future credit card statements to consolidate the information in one summary box.
- Disclosure as to consequences of only making minimum payment must now be provided.
- Notice must now be provided in advance of interest rate increases.
While these are all positive moves, the cynic in me wonders about the law of unintended consequences. By requiring the credit card companies to add new layers of bureaucracy, its cost of business has just increased which means that one or all of the following may happen:
- Increased annual fees;
- Slashed credit card reward benefits (a move which is already occurring in reaction to the American version of new credit card regulations); and
- Higher interest rates.
In other words, there may be an indirect tax to all customers which only further weakens those who cannot handle credit properly and punishes those who can.
Fundamentally, someone will always find a way to get around a law or regulation if they want to and no law is perfect. The larger question is what are governments doing to encourage education and awareness of personal financial responsibility on the consumer level? The relative silence on this matter is deafening.
6 Comments on What the proposed new credit card rules mean to you
By Silicon Prairie on May 25, 2009 at 10:56 am
At least it’s good to see that there’s no attempts to force the card issuers into giving everyone lower interest rates, like some people suggest. The allocation of payments is close to this though, and might increase introductory rates or reduce the number of balance transfer offers.
By admin on May 25, 2009 at 11:33 am
I have never been in favor of regulating the rates. If you lower the rate then many issuers will only issue cards to safer customer and you deny people without long credit histories, students, immigrants from credit.
By Cam Birch on May 25, 2009 at 12:54 pm
Most people I know who have a credit card balance are people who know full well that running a balance and paying the minimum is foolish. That doesn’t stop them and being told that it takes 10+ years to pay off a credit card won’t stop them either. More information may help the few who don’t normally run a balance but for the 50+% of people who do I don’t think any of these measures will actually change anything.
The allocation of payments to the highest interest rate item will change the credit card companies profitability. Most balance transfers are designed to get you to transfer money and then spend. This way they can collect money on the recently spent purchases. Eliminating that loophole is likely to eliminate those 0% or really low % balance transfer rates. Even so, I expect that these new regulations are just going to inspire the credit card companies to come up with other original ideas to collect money.
By Silicon Prairie on May 25, 2009 at 8:32 pm
Even if people know that minimum payments won’t pay off their balance for a long time, it doesn’t mean they’ll act on it – having the right reminder in the right place could change their behaviour.
By Michael James on May 26, 2009 at 12:55 am
I’d be pleased to see credit card rewards slashed. It makes no sense to me that credit card users should pay a percent or two less than those who pay cash.
By A Lap Of The Blogs : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com on May 29, 2009 at 2:17 am
[...] Thicken My Wallet explains the changes that are proposed for credit cards in Canada. [...]
Subscribe
Follow comments by subscribing to the What the proposed new credit card rules mean to you Comments RSS feed.