The “hail mary” school of investing

Posted by on June 24, 2009 in Investment Strategy

I have been asked several times in the last six to nine months about investing in some down and out company (Citigroup, GM, Nortel) on the thinking of  “what’s the worst thing that happens? I lose a few pennies/dollars a share. If the company turns around, I can double or triple my investment!” What scares me is that half the people who ask me this question are deadly serious.

I tend to think of this type of stock investing as being in the hail mary school of thinking- named after the hail mary pass in football where you heave the football into the end-zone in some low percentage, high reward play made in desperation.

It is, in many respect, the flip side of penny stock investing. Put your money in a business who’s salad days are in the rear view mirror in the hopes that there is still enough goodwill in the market to effect a turnaround with smart management. Think of Apple. Nissan. Puma.

But is this an effective way to invest?

First and foremost, remember Buffet’s first rule of investing: never lose money. As much as we all want to cheer the underdog (and it is weird thinking of GM as an underdog), these are long shot bets and the chances of losing money are greater than the chances of a turn-around.

Second, another Buffetism is that “cheap is not good.” There is a reason why these once large businesses are trading at such a discount. Management ruined them. The market moved past them (Nortel). They got arrogant (GM). They engaged in illegal conduct (Enron). The market tends to be efficient over long periods of time and there is a reason the stock price is so low. You can only be mediocre for so long before everyone notices.  Buffet always believes you invest in good businesses that have moderately higher valuations than bad businesses on discount.

Third, many down and out businesses have a de-listing and restructuring risk attached to it.  How do you exit if the stock gets de-listed? In most restructurings, the shareholders get crammed down as well (typically, they are greatly diluted- see most airline restructurings). Thus, even if the business re-emerges from restructuring, an investor may not be in the same position as it was when you invested.

Apple is one of the few great turnaround stories in business history but it was never in such dire straits as some companies now and, as Job’s illness has proven, it is a business partially built on a cult of personality so it remains to be seen whether Apple can be a longer term success story (anyone find it odd that Manulife is taken to task for tardy disclosure but Apple is not for hiding the fact their CEO had major surgery? Last time I checked, Apple is not above the law- unless they made an app for that too).

In other words, successful hail marys are the exception rather than the rule so invest accordingly.

7 Comments on The “hail mary” school of investing

By on June 24, 2009 at 1:09 pm

If a company is worth 1 penny a share or $100 per share, in both cases the most you can lose is still “all your money”.

By Thicken My Wallet » Blog Archive » The “hail mary” school of investing | Money Blog : 10 Dollars : Money Articles. on June 24, 2009 at 4:16 pm

[...] See original here: Thicken My Wallet » Blog Archive » The “hail mary” school of investing [...]

By A Lap Of The Blogs : on June 25, 2009 at 11:24 pm

[...] Thicken My Wallet looks at the Hail Mary School Of Investing. [...]

By This and That: Best of the Blogs Edition | Canadian Capitalist on June 26, 2009 at 8:11 am

[...] Finding their portfolios decimated, many investors are throwing the financial equivalent of a “hail Mary” pass. In this wonderful post, Thicken My Wallet points out the flaws in such a strategy. [...]

By Weakonomics Links: Mythbusting The Dow | Weakonomi¢s on June 26, 2009 at 10:30 am

[...] Thicken My Wallet writes about the hail mary school of investing.  This is in reference to buying stocks that have been hammered because of bad times.  The two best examples today are Citigroup and GM.  Both have seen their stock prices tank to next-to-nothing.  Many people think they can make a quick buck.  It’s possible, using UpDown I’ve ridden the Citi ride between $2-$4 quite successfully.  Ultimately it’s foolish to invest in these companies thinking you will make a quick buck.  You hear stories like mine above, but what you don’t hear about is I also took a 30% loss on GM stock while making (fake) money on Citi.  If you believe a company has turned a corner and new management shows promise, you have a point.  But 100 years of brand equity isn’t enough to warrant an investment. [...]

By DD on June 26, 2009 at 12:26 pm

A couple of weeks ago I wrote about how I invested in companies like the ones you mentioned. While I think you gave some great advice, I think people need to see the difference between investing in a company that is “down” and one that is “down and out”.

By LinkStuff For July 8 on April 9, 2011 at 11:20 pm

[...] The Hail Mary school of investing – This is when people gamble on fallen stocks (how much lower can they go?) [...]

Write a Comment on The “hail mary” school of investing


Follow comments by subscribing to the The “hail mary” school of investing Comments RSS feed.


Read more posts by